In this edition we discuss the compulsory powers available in the mental health system in the UK These include the Mental Capacity Act and the Mental Health Act (MHA). The regular panel is joined by Emma Rye, a Clinical Psychologist working in in the field of learning disabilities. Emma is currently in training to take up the role of a ‘Responsible Clinician’ under the MHA. We also have interviews with Dr Matthew Debenham, an NHS psychiatrist, and with service users Rai Waddingham and Raza Griffiths, both of whom discuss how compulsory powers were used in their own treatment.
As the Prime Minister has recently said she would like to ‘rip up’ the Mental Act (see below) our panel also offer Theresa May advice on what to replace it with.
The best way follow the podcast is to subscribe to our feed. You can do this by looking up Discussions in Tunbridge Wells in iTunes, SoundCloud or wherever else you get your podcasts from. Or you can paste the following link into your podcatcher of choice http://feeds.soundcloud.com/users/soundcloud:users:56544633/sounds.rss
As well as that you can follow us on Twitter @CCCUApppsy and on Facebook if you search for Canterbury Christ Church University Applied Psychology. You can follow Angela on Twitter @cyberwhispers, Anne @AnneCooke14 and Rachel @rterrypsy.
Links to things we talked about on this show:
A brief overview of the 2007 overhaul of the 1983 Mental Health Act. This 2007 update is still the dominant legislative framework today…
… and the Mental Health Act Code of Practice, intended to provide a guide for professionals, service users and carers on the operation of this legislation.
A useful summary of the principles of the Mental Capacity Act, which allows people to make ‘unwise’ decisions: provided they have the capacity to do so.
Some information on Theresa May’s Mental Health Act announcement. A pledge to ‘rip it up’…
…and some suggestions for what might replace it.
A recent paper from the British Journal of Psychiatry suggesting that being admitted to a mental health ward may have negative consequences for suicidal risks.
This Guardian article offers a personal account by a nurse involved in compulsory treatment.
This short piece by legal commentator Joshua Rozenberg highlights some of the main issue in replacing European human rights legislation.
This small research study suggests quite mixed experience of involuntary detention and also addresses some of the issues in how to improve people’s experiences.
Please note The views and opinions expressed in this discussion are those of the contributors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of any of the contributors’ employing organisations.
We’d be interested in hearing about your experiences with these laws and with compulsory treatment. Comments below are gratefully received.
Producer: John McGowan
Additional technical support: Saul McGowan