![\"\"](\"https:\/\/blogs.canterbury.ac.uk\/sustainability\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/669\/2023\/11\/Screenshot-2023-11-20-161606-1024x676.png\")
Firstly, we consider the impact of creating clothes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Jeans, a core piece of many outfits, require vast amounts of water to produce<\/a>, leading to overconsumption of water and water scarcity in areas local to their production. Even retailers considered \u201csustainable\u201d or \u201cenvironmentally ethical\u201d can\u2019t escape the inevitable issues textile production produces.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Levi\u2019s, a well-known retailer, is noted as using eco-friendly and environmental materials, as well as making efforts to cut back water consumption and gas emissions. However, a pair of Levi\u2019s 501 jeans – arguably the most popular product for the American denim company – uses 3,800 litres of water in production of a single pair<\/a>. So, while roughly 1.1 billion people worldwide have a consistent lack of water, and 2.7 billion people experience at least some scarcity of water within the space of a month – companies are using water in excess to make one pair of jeans. Buying your jeans second hand, or even by picking a pair of jeans that can be used with multiple outfits will save thousands of litres of water per pair.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Another benefit of buying used is cutting demand for new clothing. The use of toxic chemicals in dyeing and finishing fabrics has dire consequences for ecosystems and human health. In 2015, it was reported by The London School of But this price reduction isn’t even of benefit to the consumer, as fast fashion products often lack durability and quality. To stay competitive in terms of pricing, companies opt for increasingly cheaper materials, attracting a customer base looking for affordable clothing options rather than sustainable ones due to budget constraints.<\/p>\n\n\n\n However, many brands are adopting sustainable practices: using eco-friendly materials, reducing waste, and promoting ethical labour conditions. While this option may not be suited to many consumers, with the cost-of-living crisis impacting many of us – there are many retailers out there that support these goals, such as Lucy and Yak<\/a>. If buying new items at a slightly higher price point isn\u2019t an option for you \u2013 second-hand shopping may be!<\/p>\n\n\n\n Consumers are increasingly turning to second-hand\u00a0and vintage clothing, reducing the demand for new fast fashion items. Aside from benefiting the environment by limiting consumer demand, it also benefits you and me – I personally love vintage and second-hand shopping and have found pieces in my wardrobe for less than ten pounds that some would pay a hundred for.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Despite its benefits, buying second-hand is often a difficult task – with charity shops not always having the exact thing you\u2019re looking for. If you need something specific and would like to buy second-hand, the Vinted app is a great tool to find affordable items that you can search and filter for. Using this means you can find many of the staples you might want, to avoid buying them from fast fashion retailers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n But what if second-hand or sustainable options aren\u2019t available? Of course, while second-hand shopping is a great, typically affordable resource, there will always come a time where you need something specific, or it may be unsafe to buy second-hand such as underwear and swimwear. In instances like these using fast fashion retailers is pretty much inevitable, but making informed choices on where you shop is very important. Finding the typically \u201cbest of a bad bunch\u201d is often all we as the consumer can do. Raising awareness about the true cost of fast fashion empowers consumers to make more informed choices, and means that hopefully, one day, fast fashion will become a thing of the past.<\/p>\n\n\n\n If you are interested in learning more about fast fashion, an anti-fast fashion campaign has been launched by students during November. Keep your eyes out for more events and activities relating to it!<\/p>\n\n\n\n\u00a0<\/del>Economics and Political Science found that the global fashion industry produces 1.2 billion tonnes of carbon emissions each year<\/a> – with a huge contributor of that being unsustainable brands that rely on forced labour to keep prices down.<\/p>\n\n\n\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/blogs.canterbury.ac.uk\/sustainability\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/669\/2023\/11\/jack-niles-sWtg0G11F3I-unsplash-1024x683.jpg\")