Dr Andy Birtwistle, Reader in Film and Sound, has had a new article published in FKW // Zeitschrift für Geschlechterforschung und visuelle Kultur.

Noise, Agency, and the Sound of Obsolete Technology
FKW // Zeitschrift für Geschlechterforschung und visuelle Kultur, 61 (2017): Dated Formats Now: Material Practices in Audiovisual Art.

The article is available from: https://www.fkw-journal.de/index.php/fkw/article/view/1392/1394

The Abstract reads:

In a recently published collection on materiality in art Petra Lange-Berndt asks, “what does it mean to give agency to the material, to follow the material and to act with the material” (2015:13). My article attempts to consider this question, focusing on the work of a number of musicians and composers who have chosen to engage creatively with the sounds produced by obsolete – or near obsolete – technologies of sound recording and reproduction.

Every sound technology has the capacity to generate as well reproduce sound: in the case of the wax cylinder or shellac disc, surface noise is generated by physical contact between the recording medium and the needle/stylus, and with magnetic tape noise is created by the oxides used to make the tape. We might think of these sounds as the sound of technology itself – a sounding of each medium’s material and technological bases. Historically these sounds have usually been treated a problem, and successive waves of technological innovation have been directed at removing or repressing the sound of technology. Thus the move from shellac to vinyl, the development of Dolby noise reduction, and the broader the shift from analogue to digital technology, have all been partly motivated by a desire to silence the medium itself. But what happens if we choose to work with these sounds rather than repress them; and following Lange-Berndt’s prompt, what would this change in attitude mean?

My aim in this article is to consider what the political potential of the sound of technology might be, explored through a discussion of works by Walter Ruttmann and John Oswald.

The well-established discourses around the political potential of noise in the arts have tended to construct it as a form of attack: as Jacques Attali states, “Noise is a weapon” (1985: 24). But might there be other ways in which we could consider the political dimensions of noise, and if so, how might issues of materiality and agency within play though an alternative approach to the politics of noise?

In addressing these questions, my article examines the historical and temporal dynamics at work in the sound of technology. Here I argue that the temporal displacement we witness in the contemporary use of past technologies results in an intensification and re-energisation of the various forms of noise. For the artist working with archive material or obsolete sound recording and playback equipment, temporal displacement of this sort materialises the sound of technology – materializing or rematerialising the sounds with which they work – and in so doing releases forms of potentiality that can be understood in political terms.

Dr Andy Birtwistle’s research interests include film sound, avant-garde film and art cinema, sonic arts and culture, modernism, media archaeology. He is the author of Cinesonica: Sounding Film and Video (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2010) and “Photographic Sound Art and the Silent Modernity of Walter Ruttman’s Weekend (1930)” The New Soundtrack 6(2) (2016),pp. 109-27 among other works.