![\"\"](\"https:\/\/blogs.canterbury.ac.uk\/kenthistory\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/445\/2019\/08\/DSC09355-300x225.jpg\")
<\/p>\nSome of you may remember that about 15 month ago the Centre held a conference on \u2018Maritime Kent through the Ages\u2019. Following that successful day Stuart Bligh, Dr Elizabeth Edwards and I decided we should capitalise on the interest shown and edit a collection of essays under the same heading. Since then we have made considerable progress and I thought I would let you know that we are in the process of receiving essays from 23 contributors, including Professor Maryanne Kowaleski (medieval trade and industry), Dr Sandra Dunster (early modern coastal communities) and Professor Andrew Lambert (modern coastal defence). In terms of the publisher, we are continuing to work with Boydell and without wanting to jinx the project, things are looking promising on all fronts, so more details as matters progress.<\/p>\n
I\u2019m also continuing to work on the Medieval Canterbury Weekend 2020 and in addition to the speakers mentioned last week, among the others who will be at CCCU next April are Dan Jones, who will be discussing research from his new book on crusaders, and Professor John McGavin, who will consider ideas about late medieval drama in terms of performance and spectatorship that are relevant today. We are also fortunate to have Dr Catherine Delano-Smith. She will examine that fascinating medieval cartographic work, the Gough Map, while Dr Sophie Page, an expert on medieval magic, will explore cultural aspects of this subject. More details soon and as I said we hope to go live with all the details in early October.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Lady Wootton’s Green today<\/p>\n
Having mentioned St Martin\u2019s Priory last week, I thought this week I would come down to the other end of the CCCU site and give you a few details about Lady Wootton\u2019s Green for about the same period. So what do we know about the area outside Fyndon\u2019s Gate, the Great Gate of St Augustine\u2019s Abbey? Well firstly by the early 17th<\/sup> century it was known as Mulberry Tree Green or Mulberry Green\/Common or Palace Green, while the area around the what had been the abbey\u2019s almonry was sometimes called Amery Green. Interestingly there was a further variant with respect to Mulberry Tree Green because the area was also occasionally listed as Lordes Common.<\/p>\n It is not clear when the mulberry tree was planted but the tree was mentioned in the 1591\/2 city chamberlains\u2019 accounts and a few years later William Hamon of Westbere was indicted for assaulting Anthony Harrison at \u2018le Mulbery tree\u2019 in St Paul\u2019s parish. This may imply that the tree was in an open space, a view apparently endorsed by the map evidence, which meant it was probably adjacent to that other piece of open ground, called by some the \u2018Ambrey\u2019 ground, and the place where William Greeneland and his accomplice were caught stealing a sheep in 1596.<\/p>\n From John Brent’s Canterbury in the Olden Time<\/em> (1879)<\/p>\n By the same period the Green had become an enclave for several Welsh families who maintained their own language and customs, and the presence of this apparently poor immigrant group may suggest the marginal nature of the area, due in part to the loss of the abbey. For even though the abbey would quickly become a minor royal palace, initially in the post-Dissolution era it became a quarry for building stone, and some buyers in 1552-3 carted away tons of rubble as well as high quality Caen stone, while Mother Chapham paid 12d for two cart loads of flint and rubble from the old steeple and other places. Access to what had in effect become a builders\u2019 yard was through Fyndon gate, which must have caused considerable disruption for those living and working in the area. Moreover, once rebuilding started on the creation of the king\u2019s apartments within the abbey precincts further disruption was presumably inevitable, and it seems likely the saw-pit was also located in this area, which may be commemorated in the neighbourhood today by the \u2018Two Sawyers\u2019 public house.<\/p>\n Going back to the naming, the term \u2018common\u2019 may more accurately describe the land because it was \u2018waste\u2019 land in manorial terms, an area often used for communal gazing having little agricultural value. It was part of the Barton or Longport manor, which was said to contain twenty messuages, two tofts, a dovehouse, twenty gardens, 430 acres of land, fifty acres of meadow, 120 acres pasture, fifteen acres woodland and 50 acres of heath and waste, including the Green. Yet this did not mean the steward of the manor didn\u2019t care about it and the solely surviving court book has numerous entries about the Green. Beginning in 1627, one of the early entries notes the continuing encroachment by the heirs of Edward Wootton ie Lady Wootton upon the king\u2019s highway and upon the waste of the manor between St Augustine\u2019s gate and the pond called Court Sole. The \u2018heirs\u2019 were to remove the fencing they had put up, which was contrary to ancient custom, or they would be fined 40s. A few years later, under 1632, Lady Wootton is named as the culprit. She was said to have erected fencing on the king\u2019s highway, leading from Broad Street and on the manorial waste, that is Mulberry Tree Green, to Longport Street. This obstruction had been there for twelve months and she was to see to its removal within twenty days or face a 100s fine. To make matters worse she had also obstructed the common watercourse, between Mulberry Tree Green and St Augustine\u2019s Gate, and the same watercourse along Longport Street, the first offence carrying a very heavy penalty of \u00a360, suggesting its seriousness and the exasperation of the court officials. Furthermore, she was setting a very bad example to her far poorer neighbours, people like Richard Pising who had left his timber on the Common or Green, and Widow Hawkes, who was extending her ground by fencing in part of the Green next to her house. Both were to remove the offending items within twenty days or face a fine of 5s. However, Lady Wootton seems to have treated the court with contempt and over the next twenty years she was a habitual offender as she (or her servants) sought to extend her property by fencing in part of the Green and the highway, which was constantly to the detriment of the common watercourse. It was also to the disadvantage of the local people who used the Green as a common way, as their ancestors had done for centuries.<\/p>\n The site of the almonry of St Augustine’s Abbey – CAT have excavated there<\/p>\n The death of Lady Wootton removed the chief offender, and after what had become known as \u2018Lady Wootton\u2019s Palace\u2019 passed into the Hales family through marriage, it was let to a succession of lessees whose names are not recorded in the views of frankpledge for Longport for such \u2018crimes\u2019. These people, at least in the early eighteenth century, were local, like John Willesden, a fruiterer from Longport and Elizabeth Mayne, a widow, and her son Edward, who was a gardener. Their neighbours, however, did continue to encroach upon the Green: John Kingsford of Canterbury, milliner, enclosed an area four rods long by half a rod in breadth in front of his house in 1677and his son?, Samuel was similarly indicted in 1727. One of Samuel\u2019s neighbours, George Knowler was also in trouble with the court, because he had not only erected several posts but had planted trees on the road next to his messuage (the Knowler family held the Almonry). For others the area offered further opportunities. John Knockers seems to have built himself a small messuage and garden upon the waste, in this case on part of Palace Green, his successor, William Swift, paying 5s a year in rent. Such individual enterprise was at times tolerated (even encouraged?) if it brought in extra revenue, but the manorial officials were also keen to regulate issues concerning the common good. Communal responsibility was the cornerstone of their policy and in 1677 the whole borough was indicted for not repairing fencing alongside the common watercourse, and three years later the tenants faced a fine of 20s if again they failed to make the necessary repairs.<\/p>\n Moving to the early 19th<\/sup> century, William Harnett the elder, gentleman, came from Lady Wootton\u2019s Green, presumable residing in one of the largest houses there and from Charles Dickens\u2019 David Copperfield<\/em> it appears the Green was seen as suitable by the professional middle classes. Even the ghost was respectable, in 1964 it was reported that many years before a tall, elderly man, wearing a cravat but no hat, had been seen pacing up and down at night in the long passage beside the Almonry. However, the building boom of the Victorian period and, in particular, the opening up and extension of Canterbury\u2019s suburbs for development probably meant that the late medieval\/early modern houses by the Green lost much of their appeal, except to rent out, becoming the homes of artisan families and working class tenants. Yet, as elsewhere in the city, mixed housing\/status neighbourhoods remained, and Lady Wootton\u2019s Green seems to fall into this category. In addition, the same period saw the foundation of St Augustine\u2019s College (1848) thereby preserving the abbey precincts as an entity, its new use as a training college for Anglican clergy preserving the link with its monastic past, a stark contrast to the development of St Gregory\u2019s in neighbouring Northgate, which became a honeycomb of Victorian tenements.<\/p>\n Fyndon Gate – another of Brent’s illustrations<\/p>\n Changes also occurred at the Almonry. In the mid-eighteenth century it had passed out of the hands of the Knowler family to Howard Bridges, esquire, of Wootton, and a century later, in 1854, the devisees of the estate of the late John Prier, included the Almonry among the properties to be sold at auction. The purchase price was \u00a3325 but the yearly rent provided almost a tenth of this (\u00a330 11s). Among the seven heads of household of these six tenements was John Booreman, carpenter, who like his next-door neighbour, Matthew Fox, a shoemaker, had been there since at least 1841. Many of their neighbours were less affluent, like Ann Lines, aged 76 in 1851, who was living on parish relief, Margaret Middleton, who took in laundry and John Wotford, a general labourer. Those outside the Almonry in 1841 included the families of Robert Royle, sawyer, and John Kensey, colt breaker, and, even though a decade later the Kensey family had gone, Henry Royel seems to have taken on the same business. Higher status families, like Captain William Plummer who called his house \u2018St Augustine\u2019s House\u2019 in 1891, continued to form a minority of the local population during the late nineteenth century, but by 1901 such families were generally living in Broad Street or had moved to the new, fashionable houses in places like St George\u2019s Fields (New Dover Road), leaving Lady Wootton\u2019s Green to people like Clara Holness, a widow with one child who took in laundry and lodgers, Edmund Ballard, a farmworker with a daughter and granddaughter, and Stephen Best, a tailor, living with his two adult children.<\/p>\n Perceptions about the area, especially those held by Canterbury\u2019s leading citizens, can be gauged from the actions of the St Augustine\u2019s College authorities in 1896. As the new owner of what he described as two or three dilapidated cottages situated at the Broad Street end of the Green, and covering a large part of the area between the houses to the south and north, the warden, on behalf of the college, wrote to the city authorities saying that he now intended to demolish them. This was a costly undertaking because in addition to the purchase price and demolition expenses, the college would lose \u00a324 14s a year in rent. Nevertheless, he was prepared to organize this because it would provide an open vista of the college gatehouse and cathedral, a pleasing prospect, and would allow the college to provide a garden ground, planted with trees and shrubs, and a pleasure avenue for the general public. The mayor and corporation were enthusiastic backers of this proposal, contributing \u00a3150 from city funds, and the Kentish Gazette<\/em> similarly endorsed the improvements, reporting in 1897 that there was now two carriage ways surrounding a central avenue \u2018with suitably designed wrought iron railings\u2019. The reporter also commented on the central gravel walk, the flower borders, the \u2018cast iron posts of oriental design\u2019 and the widening and reforming of both carriage ways in \u2018granolithic cement\u2019. The only remaining blot on the landscape was the cowshed which abutted the city wall. This building was a legacy of the corporation\u2019s earlier policy of leasing out the city ditch and its subsequent selling of the area when such matters were finally allowed by Parliament in 1836.<\/p>\n Fyndon Gate today – now the entrance to one part of the King’s School<\/p>\n Bombing of the area during the Second World War led to heavy property losses around the Green, but much of this garden ground survived and today there are the additional statues of King Ethelbert and Queen Bertha, reminders of the area\u2019s links to its ancient Anglo-Saxon past and to the abbey and St Martin\u2019s church as two parts of Canterbury World Heritage Site, which includes the CCCU campus as the abbey\u2019s outer precinct. And next week I\u2019m hoping to bring you more about the the county\u2019s Anglo-Saxon past.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Some of you may remember that about 15 month ago the Centre held a conference on \u2018Maritime Kent through the Ages\u2019. Following that successful day Stuart Bligh, Dr Elizabeth Edwards […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6665,"featured_media":7033,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[973,822,1001,977,1581,818,978,5762,982,1162,986,1029,817,1374,1370,6230],"tags":[85,341,9,381,897,5081,3678,6266,373,137,613,6274,345,6902,3690,5118,6898,193,149,6906,4845,181,233,6930,173,6922,1557,2861,6910,93,117,2086,421,101,6914,69,6894,4630,2225,1498,289,6926,1350,3062,2962,41,6918,113,1057],"class_list":["post-7025","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-academic","category-blog-posts","category-canterbury","category-conference","category-early-modern","category-events","category-festival","category-heritage","category-kent","category-lecture","category-local-and-regional-history","category-middle-ages","category-news","category-stuarts","category-tudors","category-victorian","tag-archaeology","tag-artefacts","tag-canterbury","tag-canterbury-archaeological-trust","tag-canterbury-city","tag-canterbury-world-heritage-site","tag-cat","tag-charles-dickens","tag-church","tag-conferences","tag-dan-jones","tag-david-copperfield","tag-documents","tag-dr-catherine-delano-smith","tag-dr-elizabeth-edwards","tag-dr-sandra-dunster","tag-dr-sophie-page","tag-drama","tag-early-modern-history","tag-fyndon-gate","tag-gough-map","tag-historic-buildings","tag-history-from-below","tag-john-brent","tag-kent","tag-kentish-gazette","tag-kings-school-canterbury","tag-lady-wootton","tag-lady-woottons-green","tag-lectures","tag-local-and-regional-history","tag-maritime-kent","tag-medieval-canterbury-weekend","tag-middle-ages","tag-mulberry-tree-green","tag-primary-sources","tag-professor-andrew-lambert","tag-professor-john-mcgavin","tag-professor-maryanne-kowaleski","tag-second-world-war","tag-st-augustines-abbey","tag-st-augustines-college","tag-st-martins-church","tag-st-martins-priory","tag-stuart-bligh","tag-talk","tag-two-sawyers-pub","tag-warfare","tag-wwii"],"acf":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"authorName":"Sheila Sweetinburgh","featuredImage":"https:\/\/blogs.canterbury.ac.uk\/kenthistory\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/445\/2019\/08\/DSC09355.jpg","postExcerpt":"Some of you may remember that about 15 month ago the Centre held a conference on \u2018Maritime Kent through the Ages\u2019. Following that successful day Stuart Bligh, Dr Elizabeth Edwards […]","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.canterbury.ac.uk\/kenthistory\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7025","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.canterbury.ac.uk\/kenthistory\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.canterbury.ac.uk\/kenthistory\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.canterbury.ac.uk\/kenthistory\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6665"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.canterbury.ac.uk\/kenthistory\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7025"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.canterbury.ac.uk\/kenthistory\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7025\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7089,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.canterbury.ac.uk\/kenthistory\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7025\/revisions\/7089"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.canterbury.ac.uk\/kenthistory\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/7033"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.canterbury.ac.uk\/kenthistory\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7025"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.canterbury.ac.uk\/kenthistory\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7025"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.canterbury.ac.uk\/kenthistory\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7025"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}![\"\"](\"https:\/\/blogs.canterbury.ac.uk\/kenthistory\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/445\/2019\/08\/DSC09353-300x225.jpg\")
<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/blogs.canterbury.ac.uk\/kenthistory\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/445\/2019\/08\/DSC09357-300x225.jpg\")
<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/blogs.canterbury.ac.uk\/kenthistory\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/445\/2019\/08\/DSC09354-226x300.jpg\")
<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/blogs.canterbury.ac.uk\/kenthistory\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/445\/2019\/08\/DSC09358-244x300.jpg\")
<\/p>\n